A retrospective cohort study of the anesthetic management of postpartum tubal ligation.

BACKGROUND: Neuraxial anesthesia with reactivation of a labor epidural catheter is commonly utilized for postpartum tubal ligations (PPTL), although the optimal anesthetic approach is unknown. We assessed institutional anesthesia practices for PPTL, and evaluated the failure rates of reactivation of labor epidural catheters, de novo spinal anesthesia, and spinal anesthesia after failed blocks. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort analysis of 300 consecutive patients who underwent a PPTL and 100 having spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesthetic management data (existing labor epidural catheter reactivation, de novo spinal anesthesia or general anesthesia) were collected from electronic medical records. Anesthetic block failure rates were determined for each anesthetic technique. RESULTS: The failure rate was 15% for de novo spinal anesthesia and 23% after failed reactivation of a labor epidural catheter or spinal anesthesia. The epidural catheter reactivation failure rate was 35%. The failure rate of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery was 4%. Drug dosage, epidural catheter use in labor, time since epidural catheter placement or delivery, labor neuraxial technique (combined spinal-epidural, epidural), supplemental top-up doses during labor, and anesthesiologist experience did not predict neuraxial anesthesia failures. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis revealed an unexpectedly high neuraxial anesthesia failure rate even when de novo spinal anesthesia was used for PPTL. The results are consistent with other institutions' recent findings, and are higher than spinal anesthesia failure rates associated with cesarean delivery. Further studies are required to determine optimal anesthesia dosing strategies, and to understand the mechanisms behind high neuraxial anesthesia failures for PPTL.

An analysis of emerging food safety and fraud risks of novel insect proteins within complex supply chains.

Food consumption play a crucial role in human life, yet conventional food production and consumption patterns can be detrimental to the environment. Thus, research and development has been directed towards alternative proteins, with edible insects being promising sources. Edible insects have been recognised for their sustainable benefits providing protein, with less emission of greenhouse gas, land and water usage compared to sources, such as beef, chicken, and dairy products. Among the over 2000 known edible insect species, only four, namely yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor), migratory locust/grasshopper (Locusta migratoria), grain mould beetle, also known as lesser mealworm which is a larval form of Alphitobius diaperinus (from the family of Tenebrionidae of darkling beetles) and house cricket (Acheta domesticus), are currently authorised in specific products through specific producers in the EU. The expansion of such foods into Western diets face challenges such as consumer barriers, gaps in microbiological and chemical safety hazard data during production and processing, and the potential for fraudulent supply chain activity. The main aim of this study was to map the supply chain, through interviews with personnel along the supply chain, coupled with searches for relevant publications and governmental documents. Thus, the main potential points of food safety and fraud along the edible insect supply chain were identified. Feed substrate was identified as the main area of concern regarding microbiological and chemical food safety and novel processing techniques were forecast to be of most concern for future fraudulent activity. Despite the on-going authorisation of insect species in many countries there are substantial food safety and authenticity information gaps in this industry that need to be addressed before edible insects can be viewed as a safe and sustainable protein sources by Western consumers.

A survey of United States obstetric anesthesiologists' perceived value of obstetric anesthesiology fellowship.

INTRODUCTION: Subspecialty training in obstetric anesthesiology is associated with improved patient outcomes and reduced anesthesia-related morbidity and mortality. Despite this, the demand for fellowship-trained obstetric anesthesiologists far exceeds the supply. This survey study aimed to evaluate the perceived value of obstetric anesthesiology subspecialty training on career trajectory, job satisfaction, quality of life, and job autonomy. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, we conducted a cross-sectional study of fellowship-trained obstetric anesthesiologists in the United States of America. In March and April 2022, program directors of obstetric anesthesiology fellowships distributed an electronic survey link containing 29 multiple-choice questions to their program alumni. Survey content included respondent demographic characteristics, practice models, career information, and perceived value of an obstetric anesthesiology fellowship. RESULTS: We surveyed 217/502 (43%) fellowship-trained obstetric anesthesiologists with a response rate of 158/217 (73%). Most worked in urban, academic, and level IV perinatal health centers. The majority believed an obstetric anesthesiology fellowship was "extremely beneficial" (77%), enhanced quality of life (84%), improved the quality of patient care (99%), and was influential in helping obtain their first post-training job (86%). The perceived value of the fellowship included an enhanced career trajectory, a sense of purpose, improved job satisfaction, a sense of work community, lower burnout, involvement in maternal health initiatives, increased mentorship, and departmental leadership. CONCLUSION: In this survey study, fellowship-trained obstetric anesthesiologists perceived a positive impact of fellowship training on career trajectory, job protection and autonomy, quality of life, and job satisfaction. This information may be meaningful to trainees considering pursuing a fellowship and a career in obstetric anesthesiology.

Dosing to rash: a phase II trial of the first-line erlotinib for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study (E3503).

BACKGROUND: The development of a rash has been retrospectively associated with increased response and improved survival when treated with erlotinib at the standard dose of 150 mg per day. The objective of this trial was to evaluate the association of the activity of erlotinib in the first-line setting in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the development of a tolerable rash via dose escalation of erlotinib or tumour characteristics. METHODS: Patients, with advanced NSCLC without prior systemic therapy, were treated with erlotinib 150 mg orally per day. The dose was increased by 25mg every two weeks until the development of grade 2/tolerable rash or other dose limiting toxicity. Tumour biopsy specimens were required for inclusion. RESULTS: The study enrolled 137 patients, 135 were evaluable for safety and 124 were eligible and evaluable for response. Only 73 tumour samples were available for analysis. Erlotinib dose escalation occurred in 69/124 patients. Erlotinib was well tolerated with 70% of patients developing a grade 1/2 rash and 10% developing grade 3 rash. Response rate and disease control rate were 6.5% and 41.1% respectively. Median overall survival was 7.7 months. Toxicity and tumour markers were not associated with response. Grade 2 or greater skin rash and low phosphorylated mitogen-activated protein kinase (pMAPK) were associated with improved survival. CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival was similar in this trial compared to first-line chemotherapy in this unselected patient population. Dose escalation to the development of grade 2 skin rash was associated with improved survival in this patient population.

Phase II study of everolimus-erlotinib in previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical data suggest combining a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor with erlotinib could provide synergistic antitumor effects in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label, phase II study, patients with advanced NSCLC that progressed after one to two previous chemotherapy regimens were randomized 1:1 to erlotinib 150 mg/day±everolimus 5 mg/day. Primary end point was the disease control rate (DCR) at 3 months; secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-three patients received everolimus-erlotinib (n=66) or erlotinib alone (n=67). The DCR at 3 months was 39.4% and 28.4%, respectively. The probability for the difference in disease control at 3 months to be ≥15% was estimated to be 29.8%, which was below the prespecified probability threshold of ≥40%. Median PFS was 2.9 and 2.0 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 72.7% and 32.3% of patients, respectively. Grade 3/4 stomatitis was observed in 31.8% of combination therapy recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus 5 mg/day plus erlotinib 150 mg/day was not considered sufficiently efficacious per the predefined study criteria. The combination does not warrant further investigation based on increased toxicity and the lack of substantial improvement in disease stabilization.

Capecitabine and oxaliplatin in combination as first- or second-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer: a Wisconsin Oncology Network trial.

PURPOSE: Several cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens are active against metastatic breast cancer; however, benefits are modest and overall prognosis remains limited. For anthracycline and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer, there remains a relative paucity of therapies with significant activity. This Phase II study evaluated the combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) among patients with metastatic breast cancer being treated in the first- or second-line setting. METHODS: Patients received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15, and capecitabine 1,500 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-7 and 15-21 of a 28-day cycle. Patients were treated until progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary objective was to estimate the objective response rate by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria with tumor assessments every 8 weeks. RESULTS: Ten patients were treated of which 3 had received prior neurotoxic therapy in the metastatic setting. There were no confirmed complete responses, 5 patients had partial response, 4 patients had stable disease for at least 24 weeks, and one patient was unevaluable. Median time to progression (TTP) was 10.4 months (95% lower confidence bound [LCB]: 5.75 months), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.2 months (95% LCB: 6.14 months), and median overall survival (OS) was 19 months (95% LCB: 12.8 months). Multiple patients experienced pain syndromes and unusual neuropathies. Other common toxicities included fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea. CONCLUSIONS: XELOX is a promising regimen for anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer although careful patient selection is indicated and alternate dosing schedules should be explored to minimize neurologic morbidity.

A phase I, open-label dose-escalation study of continuous treatment with BIBF 1120 in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: BIBF 1120 is an oral potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, fibroblast growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor, the three key receptor families involved in angiogenesis. This phase I, open-label dose-escalation study investigated BIBF 1120 combined with paclitaxel (Taxol) and carboplatin in first-line patients with advanced (IIIB/IV) non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received BIBF 1120 (starting dose 50 mg b.i.d.) on days 2-21 and paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) and carboplatin [area under curve (AUC)=6 mg/ml/min] on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Primary end points were safety and BIBF 1120 maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in this combination. Pharmacokinetics (PK) profiles were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were treated (BIBF 1120 50-250 mg b.i.d.). BIBF 1120 MTD was 200 mg b.i.d. in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin. Six dose-limiting toxicity events occurred during treatment cycle 1 (liver enzyme elevations, thrombocytopenia, abdominal pain, and rash). Best responses included 7 confirmed partial responses (26.9%); 10 patients had stable disease. BIBF 1120 200 mg b.i.d. had no clinically relevant influence on the PK of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 6 mg/ml/min and vice versa. CONCLUSIONS: BIBF 1120 MTD was 200 mg b.i.d when given with paclitaxel and carboplatin; this combination demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. No relevant changes in PK parameters of the backbone chemotherapeutic agents or BIBF 1120 were observed.

Dose escalated, hypofractionated radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer: preliminary results of a risk-stratified phase I dose escalation study.

To improve local control for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a phase I dose escalation study for locally advanced and medically inoperable patients was devised to escalate tumor dose while limiting the dose to organs at risk including the esophagus, spinal cord, and residual lung. Helical tomotherapy provided image-guided IMRT, delivered in a 5-week hypofractionated schedule to minimize the effect of accelerated repopulation. Forty-six patients judged not to be surgical candidates with Stage I-IV NSCLC were treated. Concurrent chemotherapy was not allowed. Radiotherapy was delivered via helical tomotherapy and limited to the primary site and clinically proven or suspicious nodal regions without elective nodal irradiation. Patients were placed in 1 of 5 dose bins, all treated for 25 fractions, with dose per fraction ranging from 2.28 to 3.22 Gy. The bin doses of 57 to 80.5 Gy result in 2 Gy/fraction normalized tissue dose (NTD) equivalents of 60 to 100 Gy. In each bin, the starting dose was determined by the relative normalized tissue mean dose modeled to cause < 20% Grade 2 pneumonitis. Dose constraints included spinal cord maximum NTD of 50 Gy, esophageal maximum NTD < 64 Gy to < or = 0.5 cc volume, and esophageal effective volume of 30%. No grade 3 RTOG acute pneumonitis (NCI-CTC v.3) or esophageal toxicities (CTCAE v.3.0 and RTOG) were observed at median follow-up of 8.1 months. Pneumonitis rates were 70% grade 1 and 13% grade 2. Multivariate analysis identified lung NTD(mean) (p=0.012) and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy following radiotherapy (p=0.015) to be independent risk factors for grade 2 pneumonitis. Only seven patients (15%) required narcotic analgesics (RTOG grade 2 toxicity) for esophagitis, with only 2.3% average weight loss during treatment. Best in-field gross response rates were 17% complete response, 43% partial response, 26% stable disease, and 6.5% in-field thoracic progression. The out-of-field thoracic failure rate was 13%, and distal failure rate was 28%. The median survival was 18 months with 2-year overall survival of 46.8% +/- 9.7% for this cohort, 50% of whom were stage IIIB and 30% stage IIIA. Dose escalation can be safely achieved in NSCLC with lower than expected rates of pneumonitis and esophagitis using hypofractionated image-guided IMRT. The maximum tolerated dose has yet to be reached.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with cardiac dysfunction: feasibility and reversibility of ventricular and valvular dysfunction with transplant-induced remission.

Patients with cardiac dysfunction may be at increased risk of cardiac toxicity when undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), which may preclude them from receiving this therapy. Cardiac dysfunction is, however, common in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. While autologous HSCT (auto-HSCT) has been performed increasingly for SLE, its impact on cardiac function has not previously been evaluated. We, therefore, performed a retrospective analysis of SLE patients who had undergone auto-HSCT in our center to determine the prevalence of significant cardiac involvement, and the impact of transplantation on this. The records of 55 patients were reviewed, of which 13 were found to have abnormal cardiac findings on pre-transplant two-dimensional echocardiography or multi-gated acquisition scan: impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (n = 6), pulmonary hypertension (n = 5), mitral valve dysfunction (n = 3) and large pericardial effusion (n = 1). At a median follow-up of 24 months (8-105 months), there were no transplant-related or cardiac deaths. With transplant-induced disease remission, all patients with impaired LVEF remained stable or improved; while three with symptomatic mitral valve disease similarly improved. Elevated pulmonary pressures paralleled activity of underlying lupus. These data suggest that auto-HSCT is feasible in selected patients with lupus-related cardiac dysfunction, and with control of disease activity, may improve.

Mobilization, harvesting and selection of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with autoimmune diseases undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were mobilized in 130 patients with autoimmune diseases undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using cyclophosphamide 2 g/m(2) and either granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 mcg/kg/day (for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, SPMS) or G-CSF 10 mcg/kg/day (for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), Crohn's disease (CD), systemic sclerosis (SSc), and other immune-mediated disorders). Mobilization-related mortality was 0.8% (one of 130) secondary to infection. Circulating peripheral blood (PB) CD34(+) cells/microl differed significantly by disease. Collected CD34(+) cells/kg/apheresis and overall collection efficiency was significantly better using Spectra apheresis device compared to the Fenwall CS3000 instrument. Patients with SLE and RRMS achieved the lowest and the highest CD34(+) cell yields, respectively. Ex vivo CD34(+) cell selection employing Isolex 300iv2.5 apparatus was significantly more efficient compared to CEPRATE CS device. Circulating PB CD34(+) cells/microl correlated positively with initial CD34(+) cells/kg/apheresis and enriched product CD34(+) cells/kg. Mean WBC and platelet engraftment (ANC>0.5 x 10(9)/l and platelet count >20 x 10(9)/l) occurred on days 9 and 11, respectively. Infused CD34(+) cell/kg dose showed significant direct correlation with faster white blood cell (WBC) and platelet engraftment. When adjusted for CD34(+) cell/kg dose, patients treated with a myeloablative regimen had significantly slower WBC and platelet recovery compared to non-myeloablative regimens.

The rationale behind autologous autoimmune hematopoietic stem cell transplant conditioning regimens: concerns over the use of total-body irradiation in systemic sclerosis.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is becoming an increasingly recognized indication for treatment of autoimmune diseases and severe immune-mediated disorders. However, multicenter registry data have demonstrated higher than anticipated early toxicity, approximately 10% for autoimmune diseases in general, and 20-27% for diffuse systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). If uncorrected, this high treatment-related mortality will hinder development of stem cell therapy for immune-mediated diseases. In order to develop safer regimens, we address some pitfalls and concepts involved in design and selection of conditioning regimens for autoimmune diseases in general, and because it is associated with the highest regimen-related toxicity, scleroderma in specific.

Development of a phase III trial of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for systemic lupus erythematosus.

At Northwestern University, a phase I/II trial of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has shown promising results. A phase III HSCT trial is being developed to confirm efficacy of HSCT vs continuing the currently accepted standard of care, intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe Crohn's disease.

It is clear that some patients with severe Crohn's disease (CD) fail to respond favorably to the standard treatment, including antibody to Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha (TNFalpha), We have embarked on a unique therapy for this group of patients, intense immune suppression followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The response to this approach in our first four patients has been excellent, with there being no significant untoward event from the transplantation and with each patient entering clinical remission in terms of the Crohn's Disease Activity Index off all therapy for CD and no diarrhea or abdominal pain. However, some evidence of minor laboratory abnormalities and slight inflammation of the colon on colonoscopic evaluation persist up to 1 year post-transplant. It is suggested that HSCT should be considered a reasonable option for patients who have failed standard CD therapy, although long-term follow-up will be necessary to confirm the duration of the induced clinical remission.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for systemic sclerosis with rapid improvement in skin scores: is neoangiogenesis occurring?

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is presumed to be an immune-mediated vasculopathy of unknown etiology. SSc is unresponsive to most immune-modulating therapies except for intravenous cyclophosphamide, which is reported to demonstrate some benefit. We, therefore, dose-escalated cyclophosphamide to 200 mg/kg and added rabbit ATG 7.5 mg/kg along with infusion of unselected hematopoietic stem cells to minimize the cytopenic interval. Engraftment occurred rapidly (day 8) with minimal unexpected toxicity, no infections, and unexpectedly rapid improvement in the modified Rodnan Skin Score.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for autoimmune diseases: nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for autoimmune diseases have been, because of safety reasons, overwhelmingly autologous. Results are, in general, encouraging with improvement in quality of life, a remission of up to several years, and perhaps in some diseases improved survival. This indicates that further study of autologous HSCT especially under phase III design is warranted. However, the ultimate goal of HSCT is cure of otherwise incurable autoimmune diseases. For this reason, allogeneic HSCT in carefully selected high-risk patients with autoimmune diseases using strategies to minimize both regimen-related toxicity and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is ongoing at Northwestern University and will be reviewed briefly.

The promise of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for autoimmune diseases.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is being increasingly utilized for the treatment of a whole spectrum of severe autoimmune diseases refractory to conventional therapy. Although allogeneic HSCT has been followed by durable complete remission in a restricted number of patients with coincidental disease, the autologous procedure is generally preferred because of its lesser toxicity. Most autoimmune diseases are the consequence of a multistep process, mainly originating from the interplay of genetic, environmental, and hormonal factors. It has been postulated that if immunosuppressive regimens can eliminate or effectively reduce the level of autoreactive T and B cells, then regeneration of de novo immunity even in the autologous setting may bypass the initial breakdown of self-tolerance and ensure prolonged disease remission. As mentioned in a recent review of this field, protocol design including conditioning regimen, patient selection, stem cell source and final outcome are likely to be disease-specific. The following is a summary of the 2002 International Bone Marrow Transplantation Registry/American Society of Blood and Bone Marrow Transplantation (IBMTR/ASBMT) satellite symposium in Orlando, Florida on 24 February 2002 on 'Expanding the Promise of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Autoimmune Diseases'.

Ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide combined with 41.8 degrees C whole body hyperthermia for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

We performed a phase II study combining 41.8 degrees C whole body hyperthermia with ICE chemotherapy, i.e. ifosfamide (5 g/m(2)), carboplatin (300 mg/m(2)) and etoposide (150 mg/m(2) on days 2 and 3), administered every 4 weeks, for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Of 27 chemonäive, non-metastatic patients enrolled, 25 patients were evaluable for response. Overall response rate was 20% (five partial remissions; 95% CI 8.9-39.1%). Median survival time from the start of treatment for all patients was 76.6 weeks (95% CI 65.4-87.8 weeks). Progression free survival for all patients measured 29.6 weeks (95% CI 24.4-34.7 weeks). One year overall survival was 68% and 2 year overall survival was 20%. Major treatment toxicities included grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 74 and 33% of treatment cycles, respectively. One patient died due to sepsis. These promising results are consistent with continued clinical investigation; a phase III clinical trial with whole body hyperthermia as the independent variable has been initiated.

Lack of caregivers limits use of outpatient hematopoietic stem cell transplant program.

Our goal was to compare direct and indirect medical costs and quality of life associated with inpatient vs outpatient autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AuHSCT). Twenty-one sequential outpatients and 26 inpatients were enrolled on this prospective trial. All candidates for AuHSCT were screened for eligibility for outpatient transplantation. Patients with either breast cancer or hematologic malignancy, insurance coverage for the outpatient procedure, one to three caregivers available to provide 24 h coverage, and no significant comorbidities were eligible to participate. Patients without caregivers or insurance coverage for outpatient transplant were accrued to the study in a consecutive manner as inpatient controls, based on willingness to participate in the quality of life portion of the study and to permit review of their hospital and billing records. Approximately half of all 139 prospective outpatient candidates were ineligible because they lacked a caregiver. Most commonly, the patient without a caregiver was single or widowed or their family and friends were needed to provide childcare. Most caregivers were college educated from families with incomes greater than US dollars 80000. Indirect costs to the caregivers totaled a median of US dollars 2520 (range US dollars 684-US dollars 4508), with the majority attributed to lost 'opportunity costs'. Overall, there were significant differences in the total costs of treatment for inpatient vs outpatient AuHSCT (US dollars 40985 vs US dollars 29210, P < 0.01)). In general, no significant differences were detected between inpatient and outpatient scores on quality of life measures. Although significant cost savings were associated with outpatient transplantation, this approach was applicable to only half of our otherwise eligible candidates because of a lack of caregivers. The financial burden associated with the caretaking role may underlie this finding.

Engraftment syndrome: a common cause for rash and fever following autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple sclerosis.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is currently being evaluated as a therapy for patients with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) at risk of debilitating neurological impairment. While preliminary results from a few studies have been reported, little is known about toxicities or outcome of HSCT for MS. We report a relatively frequent triad of non-infectious fever, rash and fatigue or lassitude that may also be associated with pruritus, pulmonary symptoms, and eosinophilia and frequently occurs around engraftment. This syndrome occurred in 26% of our series of patients (5/19) undergoing HSCT for multiple sclerosis. The engraftment syndrome is usually self-limited but may require intervention with systemic corticosteroids.

Treatment of relapse after autologous blood stem cell transplantation for severe rheumatoid arthritis.

There is little information about the clinical course of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who relapse after autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT). We describe 6 patients with severe RA who received ASCT in 3 US centers. Duration of followup was between 24 and 42 months posttransplant. Five patients achieved major responses but relapsed 3-22 months posttransplant. Two patients with relapse improved remarkably after restarting disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD). Two patients developed a mild RA flare at 3 and 5 months posttransplant and improved spontaneously. All 4 patients who improved after an initial disease flare remained highly functional at 14-22 months posttransplant. All patients in this study were anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) drug naive; all received a TNF blocker as a second line posttransplant salvage therapy, but only 3 responded. Future ASCT strategies need to focus on improving the durability of the early posttransplant responses.